Intel Xeon W-3345
AMD Epyc 7702
Videokarte 1 auswählen
Videokarte 2 auswählen

Intel Xeon W-3345 gegen AMD Epyc 7702. Spezifikationen, Leistung, Tests

Gesamtnote
star star star star star
Freigegeben
Q3/2021
Intel Xeon W-3345
Intel Xeon W-3345
Freigegeben
Q3/2019
Gesamtnote
star star star star star
AMD Epyc 7702
AMD Epyc 7702

Vergleichen Sie Intel Xeon W-3345 VS AMD Epyc 7702. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Intel Xeon W-3345 boasts a maximum frequency of 3.00 GHz GHz. 24 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 250 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Freigegeben in Q3/2021, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

AMD Epyc 7702 features a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz GHz. 64 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 200 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2019, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Unterschiede

Intel Xeon W-3345 Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
Intel Xeon W-3345
Einen Fehler melden
  • Höhere Taktfrequenz

    Rund um 33% höhere taktfrequenz

    3.00 GHz left arrow 2.00 GHz
  • Höhere Turbotaktfrequenz

    Rund um 16% bessere übertaktete taktrate

    4.00 GHz left arrow 3.35 GHz

Positionen in allen Ranglisten

Gemeinsame Standpunkte Intel Xeon W-3345 CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.

No data
AMD Epyc 7702 Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
AMD Epyc 7702
Einen Fehler melden
  • Platz in der Gesamtwertung

    (basierend auf mehreren Benchmarks)

    211 left arrow score
  • Größere Anzahl von Kernen

    About 2.67 Mehr Kerne

    64 left arrow 24
  • Leistung pro Watt

    About 0.8 weniger Wärmeentwicklung durch den Prozessor, W.

    200 W left arrow 250 W

Positionen in allen Ranglisten

Gemeinsame Standpunkte AMD Epyc 7702 CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    303 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    6 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    336 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    4 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    796 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    167 place
  • Monero Hashrate kH/s
    4 place
  • Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
    87 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    44 place

Specifications

Technische Daten
Intel Xeon W-3345 Intel Xeon W-3345
AMD Epyc 7702 AMD Epyc 7702
CPU-Familie und Gruppe

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Serie
    Intel Xeon W left arrow AMD Epyc
  • Generation
    8 left arrow 2
  • CPU Gruppe
    Intel Xeon W-3300 left arrow AMD Epyc 7002
  • Vergangenes Modell
    Intel Xeon W-3245 left arrow --
Technische Daten der CPU

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequenz
    3.00 GHz left arrow 2.00 GHz
  • CPU Kerne
    24 left arrow 64
  • Turbo (1 Kern)
    4.00 GHz left arrow 3.35 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    48 left arrow 128
  • Hyperthreading
    Ja left arrow Ja
  • Übertaktung
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • Zentrale Architektur
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU-Name
    keine iGPU left arrow keine iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    kein Turbo left arrow kein Turbo
Hardware Codec Unterstützung

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • h264
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VP9
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VP8
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • AV1
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • AVC
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VC-1
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • JPEG
    Nein left arrow Nein
Speicherspezifikationen & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD Epyc 7702 und Intel Xeon W-3345. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Speicher Typ
    DDR4-3200 left arrow DDR4-3200
  • Max. Speicher
    4096 GB left arrow
  • ECC
    Ja left arrow Ja
  • Speicherkanäle
    8 left arrow 8
  • PCIe-Version
    4.0 left arrow 4.0
  • PCIe-Lanes
    64 left arrow 128
Verschlüsselung
  • AES-NI
    Ja left arrow Ja
Energieverbrauch

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Xeon W-3345 und AMD Epyc 7702 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    250 W left arrow 200 W
Technologien und Erweiterungen

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon W-3345 und AMD Epyc 7702, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Befehlssatz (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualisierung
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow AMD-V, SVM
  • ISA-Erweiterungen
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
  • L2-Cache
    30.00 MB left arrow --
  • L3-Cache
    36.00 MB left arrow 256.00 MB
  • Architektur
    Ice Lake W left arrow Rome (Zen 2)
  • technisches verfahren
    10 nm left arrow 7 nm
  • Steckdose
    LGA 4189 left arrow SP3
  • Datum der Veröffentlichung
    Q3/2021 left arrow Q3/2019

Benchmarks (tests)

Leistungstests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Xeon W-3345 und AMD Epyc 7702.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Letzte Vergleiche