Vergleichen Sie Intel Xeon D-1623N VS Intel Atom C3338. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
Intel Xeon D-1623N boasts a maximum frequency of 2.40 GHz GHz. 4 / 8 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 35 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Freigegeben in Q2/2019, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
Intel Atom C3338 features a maximum frequency of 1.50 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 8.5 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2017, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Gründe für die Berücksichtigung Höhere Taktfrequenz
Rund um 38% höhere taktfrequenz
1.50 GHz
Größere Anzahl von Kernen
2 Mehr Kerne
2
Höhere Turbotaktfrequenz
Rund um 31% bessere übertaktete taktrate
2.20 GHz
Gemeinsame Standpunkte Intel Xeon D-1623N CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.
No data
Gründe für die Berücksichtigung Leistung pro Watt
About 0.24 weniger Wärmeentwicklung durch den Prozessor, W.
35 W
Gemeinsame Standpunkte Intel Atom C3338 CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.
No data
Intel Xeon D-1623N
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Intel Atom
Intel Atom C3000
Desktop / Server
2
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
normal
Nein
1.50 GHz
The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.
keine iGPU
kein Turbo
This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Atom C3338 und Intel Xeon D-1623N. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR4-1866
128 GB
1
Ja
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Xeon D-1623N und Intel Atom C3338 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
8.5 W
100 °C
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon D-1623N und Intel Atom C3338, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2
4.00 MB
Denverton
14 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
BGA 1310
Q3/2017
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Xeon D-1623N und Intel Atom C3338.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
