Intel Xeon D-1602
Intel Celeron G3900T
Videokarte 1 auswählen
Videokarte 2 auswählen

Intel Xeon D-1602 gegen Intel Celeron G3900T. Spezifikationen, Leistung, Tests

Gesamtnote
star star star star star
Freigegeben
Q2/2019
Intel Xeon D-1602
Intel Xeon D-1602
Freigegeben
Q1/2016
Gesamtnote
star star star star star
Intel Celeron G3900T
Intel Celeron G3900T

Vergleichen Sie Intel Xeon D-1602 VS Intel Celeron G3900T. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Intel Xeon D-1602 boasts a maximum frequency of 2.50 GHz GHz. 2 / 4 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 27 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Freigegeben in Q2/2019, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Celeron G3900T features a maximum frequency of 2.60 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 35 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q1/2016, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Unterschiede

Intel Xeon D-1602 Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
Intel Xeon D-1602
Einen Fehler melden
  • Leistung pro Watt

    weniger Wärmeentwicklung durch den Prozessor, W.

    27 W left arrow 35 W

Positionen in allen Ranglisten

Gemeinsame Standpunkte Intel Xeon D-1602 CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.

No data
Intel Celeron G3900T Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
Intel Celeron G3900T
Einen Fehler melden
  • Platz in der Gesamtwertung

    (basierend auf mehreren Benchmarks)

    1238 left arrow score
  • Höhere Taktfrequenz

    Rund um 4% höhere taktfrequenz

    2.60 GHz left arrow 2.50 GHz

Positionen in allen Ranglisten

Gemeinsame Standpunkte Intel Celeron G3900T CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    772 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    903 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1384 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    531 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    656 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    299 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    603 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    242 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1083 place

Specifications

Technische Daten
Intel Xeon D-1602 Intel Xeon D-1602
Intel Celeron G3900T Intel Celeron G3900T
CPU-Familie und Gruppe

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Serie
    Intel Xeon D left arrow Intel Celeron
  • CPU Gruppe
    Intel Xeon D-1600 left arrow Intel Celeron G3000
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 6
Technische Daten der CPU

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Zentrale Architektur
    normal left arrow normal
  • Übertaktung
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • Frequenz
    2.50 GHz left arrow 2.60 GHz
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU-Name
    keine iGPU left arrow Intel HD Graphics 510
  • GPU frequency
    left arrow 0.35 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    kein Turbo left arrow 0.95 GHz
  • Ausführungseinheiten
    left arrow 12
  • Shader
    left arrow 96
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 32 GB
  • Max. displays
    left arrow 3
  • Generation
    left arrow 9
  • technisches verfahren
    left arrow 14 nm
  • Datum der Veröffentlichung
    left arrow Q1/2015
Hardware Codec Unterstützung

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Nein left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Nein left arrow Decode
  • h264
    Nein left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Nein left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Nein left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • AVC
    Nein left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Nein left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Nein left arrow Decode
Speicherspezifikationen & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Celeron G3900T und Intel Xeon D-1602. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Speicher Typ
    DDR4-2133 left arrow DDR4-2133
  • Max. Speicher
    128 GB left arrow
  • Speicherkanäle
    2 left arrow 2
  • ECC
    Ja left arrow Ja
Energieverbrauch

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Xeon D-1602 und Intel Celeron G3900T to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    27 W left arrow 35 W
Technologien und Erweiterungen

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon D-1602 und Intel Celeron G3900T, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Befehlssatz (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA-Erweiterungen
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L2-Cache
    3.00 MB left arrow --
  • L3-Cache
    -- left arrow 2.00 MB
  • Architektur
    Hewitt Lake left arrow Skylake S
  • technisches verfahren
    14 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Virtualisierung
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • Steckdose
    BGA 1667 left arrow LGA 1151
  • Datum der Veröffentlichung
    Q2/2019 left arrow Q1/2016

Benchmarks (tests)

Leistungstests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Xeon D-1602 und Intel Celeron G3900T.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Letzte Vergleiche