Vergleichen Sie Intel Celeron G1620 VS Intel Xeon E3-1270. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
Intel Celeron G1620 boasts a maximum frequency of 2.70 GHz GHz. 2 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 55 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Freigegeben in Q1/2013, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
Intel Xeon E3-1270 features a maximum frequency of 3.40 GHz GHz. 4 / 8 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 80 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q2/2011, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Gründe für die Berücksichtigung Platz in der Gesamtwertung
(basierend auf mehreren Benchmarks)
score
Leistung pro Watt
weniger Wärmeentwicklung durch den Prozessor, W.
80 W
Gemeinsame Standpunkte Intel Celeron G1620 CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.
Gründe für die Berücksichtigung Platz in der Gesamtwertung
(basierend auf mehreren Benchmarks)
score
Höhere Taktfrequenz
Rund um 21% höhere taktfrequenz
2.70 GHz
Größere Anzahl von Kernen
About 2 Mehr Kerne
2
Gemeinsame Standpunkte Intel Xeon E3-1270 CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.
Intel Celeron G1620
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Desktop / Server
Intel Xeon E3
2
Intel Xeon E3
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
3.40 GHz
3.80 GHz
Ja
Nein
normal
The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.
keine iGPU
kein Turbo
This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Xeon E3-1270 und Intel Celeron G1620. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR3-1333
32 GB
Ja
2
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Celeron G1620 und Intel Xeon E3-1270 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
80 W
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Celeron G1620 und Intel Xeon E3-1270, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
x86-64 (64 bit)
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX
8.00 MB
Sandy-Bridge
32 nm
LGA 1155
Q2/2011
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Celeron G1620 und Intel Xeon E3-1270.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
