Intel Atom C3750
Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3
Videokarte 1 auswählen
Videokarte 2 auswählen

Intel Atom C3750 gegen Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3. Spezifikationen, Leistung, Tests

Gesamtnote
star star star star star
Freigegeben
Q3/2017
Intel Atom C3750
Intel Atom C3750
Freigegeben
Q3/2014
Gesamtnote
star star star star star
Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3
Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3

Vergleichen Sie Intel Atom C3750 VS Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Intel Atom C3750 boasts a maximum frequency of 2.20 GHz GHz. 8 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 21 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Freigegeben in Q3/2017, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 features a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz GHz. 6 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 52 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2014, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Unterschiede

Intel Atom C3750 Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
Intel Atom C3750
Einen Fehler melden
  • Höhere Taktfrequenz

    Rund um 9% höhere taktfrequenz

    2.20 GHz left arrow 2.00 GHz
  • Größere Anzahl von Kernen

    2 Mehr Kerne

    8 left arrow 6
  • Leistung pro Watt

    weniger Wärmeentwicklung durch den Prozessor, W.

    21 W left arrow 52 W

Positionen in allen Ranglisten

Gemeinsame Standpunkte Intel Atom C3750 CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.

No data
Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3
Einen Fehler melden
  • Platz in der Gesamtwertung

    (basierend auf mehreren Benchmarks)

    1010 left arrow score

Positionen in allen Ranglisten

Gemeinsame Standpunkte Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    911 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    472 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    604 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    276 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    594 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    332 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    740 place

Specifications

Technische Daten
Intel Atom C3750 Intel Atom C3750
Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3
CPU-Familie und Gruppe

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Serie
    Intel Atom left arrow Intel Xeon E5
  • Generation
    2 left arrow 5
  • CPU Gruppe
    Intel Atom C3000 left arrow Intel Xeon E5 v3
Technische Daten der CPU

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequenz
    2.20 GHz left arrow 2.00 GHz
  • CPU Kerne
    8 left arrow 6
  • Turbo (1 Kern)
    2.40 GHz left arrow kein Turbo
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 12
  • Hyperthreading
    Nein left arrow Ja
  • Übertaktung
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • Zentrale Architektur
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU-Name
    keine iGPU left arrow keine iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    kein Turbo left arrow kein Turbo
Hardware Codec Unterstützung

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • h264
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VP9
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VP8
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • AV1
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • AVC
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VC-1
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • JPEG
    Nein left arrow Nein
Speicherspezifikationen & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 und Intel Atom C3750. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Speicher Typ
    DDR4-2133 left arrow DDR4-2133
  • Max. Speicher
    256 GB left arrow
  • ECC
    Ja left arrow Ja
  • Speicherkanäle
    2 left arrow 4
  • PCIe-Version
    3.0 left arrow 3.0
  • PCIe-Lanes
    12 left arrow 40
Verschlüsselung
  • AES-NI
    Ja left arrow Ja
Energieverbrauch

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Atom C3750 und Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    21 W left arrow 52 W
  • Maximale Temperatur
    100 °C left arrow --
Technologien und Erweiterungen

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Atom C3750 und Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Befehlssatz (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualisierung
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA-Erweiterungen
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
  • L2-Cache
    16.00 MB left arrow --
  • L3-Cache
    -- left arrow 15.00 MB
  • Architektur
    Denverton left arrow Haswell E
  • technisches verfahren
    14 nm left arrow 22 nm
  • Steckdose
    BGA 1310 left arrow LGA 2011-3
  • Datum der Veröffentlichung
    Q3/2017 left arrow Q3/2014

Benchmarks (tests)

Leistungstests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Atom C3750 und Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Letzte Vergleiche