Vergleichen Sie AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 VS AMD Epyc 7F52. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 boasts a maximum frequency of 3.10 GHz GHz. 12 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 65 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Freigegeben in Q3/2019, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
AMD Epyc 7F52 features a maximum frequency of 3.50 GHz GHz. 16 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 240 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q2/2020, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Gründe für die Berücksichtigung Platz in der Gesamtwertung
(basierend auf mehreren Benchmarks)
score
Höhere Turbotaktfrequenz
Rund um 9% bessere übertaktete taktrate
3.90 GHz
Leistung pro Watt
weniger Wärmeentwicklung durch den Prozessor, W.
240 W
Gemeinsame Standpunkte AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.
Gründe für die Berücksichtigung Höhere Taktfrequenz
Rund um 11% höhere taktfrequenz
3.10 GHz
Größere Anzahl von Kernen
About 1.33 Mehr Kerne
12
Gemeinsame Standpunkte AMD Epyc 7F52 CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Desktop / Server
AMD Epyc
2
AMD Epyc 7002
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
3.50 GHz
16
3.90 GHz
32
Ja
Nein
normal
The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.
keine iGPU
kein Turbo
This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD Epyc 7F52 und AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR4-3200
Ja
8
4.0
128
Ja
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 und AMD Epyc 7F52 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
240 W
--
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 und AMD Epyc 7F52, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
x86-64 (64 bit)
AMD-V, SVM
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
256.00 MB
Rome (Zen 2)
7 nm
SP3
Q2/2020
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 und AMD Epyc 7F52.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
