AMD Epyc Embedded 3451
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF
Videokarte 1 auswählen
Videokarte 2 auswählen

AMD Epyc Embedded 3451 gegen AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF. Spezifikationen, Leistung, Tests

Gesamtnote
star star star star star
Freigegeben
Q1/2018
AMD Epyc Embedded 3451
AMD Epyc Embedded 3451
Freigegeben
Q4/2019
Gesamtnote
star star star star star
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF

Vergleichen Sie AMD Epyc Embedded 3451 VS AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

AMD Epyc Embedded 3451 boasts a maximum frequency of 2.14 GHz GHz. 16 / 32 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 100 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Freigegeben in Q1/2018, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF features a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz GHz. 6 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 65 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q4/2019, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Unterschiede

AMD Epyc Embedded 3451 Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
AMD Epyc Embedded 3451
Einen Fehler melden
  • Größere Anzahl von Kernen

    10 Mehr Kerne

    16 left arrow 6

Positionen in allen Ranglisten

Gemeinsame Standpunkte AMD Epyc Embedded 3451 CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.

  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    209 place
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF
Einen Fehler melden
  • Platz in der Gesamtwertung

    (basierend auf mehreren Benchmarks)

    641 left arrow score
  • Höhere Taktfrequenz

    Rund um 33% höhere taktfrequenz

    3.20 GHz left arrow 2.14 GHz
  • Höhere Turbotaktfrequenz

    Rund um 17 % bessere übertaktete taktrate

    3.60 GHz left arrow 3.00 GHz
  • Leistung pro Watt

    About 0.65 weniger Wärmeentwicklung durch den Prozessor, W.

    65 W left arrow 100 W

Positionen in allen Ranglisten

Gemeinsame Standpunkte AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    324 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    233 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    228 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    461 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    254 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    594 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    505 place
  • Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
    94 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    442 place

Specifications

Technische Daten
AMD Epyc Embedded 3451 AMD Epyc Embedded 3451
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF
CPU-Familie und Gruppe

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Serie
    AMD Epyc left arrow AMD Ryzen
  • CPU Gruppe
    AMD Epyc Embedded 3000 left arrow AMD Ryzen 2000
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Generation
    1 left arrow 2
Technische Daten der CPU

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Zentrale Architektur
    normal left arrow normal
  • Übertaktung
    Ja left arrow Ja
  • Frequenz
    2.14 GHz left arrow 3.20 GHz
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU-Name
    keine iGPU left arrow keine iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    kein Turbo left arrow kein Turbo
Hardware Codec Unterstützung

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • h264
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VP8
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VP9
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • AV1
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • AVC
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VC-1
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • JPEG
    Nein left arrow Nein
Speicherspezifikationen & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF und AMD Epyc Embedded 3451. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Speicher Typ
    DDR4-2666 left arrow DDR4-2666
  • Max. Speicher
    1024 GB left arrow
  • Speicherkanäle
    4 left arrow 2
  • ECC
    Ja left arrow Ja
Energieverbrauch

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD Epyc Embedded 3451 und AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    100 W left arrow 65 W
  • TDP down
    80 W left arrow --
  • Maximale Temperatur
    105 °C left arrow 95 °C
Technologien und Erweiterungen

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD Epyc Embedded 3451 und AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Befehlssatz (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA-Erweiterungen
    SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
  • L2-Cache
    8.00 MB left arrow --
  • L3-Cache
    32.00 MB left arrow 16.00 MB
  • Architektur
    Snowy Owl (Zen) left arrow Pinnacle Ridge (Zen+)
  • technisches verfahren
    14 nm left arrow 12 nm
  • Virtualisierung
    AMD-V, SVM left arrow AMD-V, SVM
  • Steckdose
    SP4 left arrow AM4
  • Datum der Veröffentlichung
    Q1/2018 left arrow Q4/2019

Benchmarks (tests)

Leistungstests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD Epyc Embedded 3451 und AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Letzte Vergleiche