Vergleichen Sie AMD Epyc 7702P VS AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
AMD Epyc 7702P boasts a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz GHz. 64 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 200 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Freigegeben in Q3/2019, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX features a maximum frequency of 3.50 GHz GHz. 32 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 280 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2020, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Gründe für die Berücksichtigung Platz in der Gesamtwertung
(basierend auf mehreren Benchmarks)
score
Größere Anzahl von Kernen
32 Mehr Kerne
32
Leistung pro Watt
weniger Wärmeentwicklung durch den Prozessor, W.
280 W
Gemeinsame Standpunkte AMD Epyc 7702P CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.
Gründe für die Berücksichtigung Platz in der Gesamtwertung
(basierend auf mehreren Benchmarks)
score
Höhere Taktfrequenz
Rund um 43% höhere taktfrequenz
2.00 GHz
Höhere Turbotaktfrequenz
Rund um 20 % bessere übertaktete taktrate
3.35 GHz
Gemeinsame Standpunkte AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.
AMD Epyc 7702P
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Desktop / Server
AMD Ryzen
3
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3000
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
3.50 GHz
32
4.20 GHz
64
Ja
Ja
normal
The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.
keine iGPU
kein Turbo
This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX und AMD Epyc 7702P. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR4-3200
2048 GB
Ja
8
4.0
72
Ja
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD Epyc 7702P und AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
280 W
95 °C
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD Epyc 7702P und AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
x86-64 (64 bit)
AMD-V, SVM
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
16.00 MB
128.00 MB
Castle Peak (Zen 2)
7 nm
WRX8 (sWRX8)
Q3/2020
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD Epyc 7702P und AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
