AMD E2-3800
Intel Celeron N3010
Videokarte 1 auswählen
Videokarte 2 auswählen

AMD E2-3800 gegen Intel Celeron N3010. Spezifikationen, Leistung, Tests

Gesamtnote
star star star star star
Freigegeben
Q4/2013
AMD E2-3800
AMD E2-3800
Freigegeben
Q1/2016
Gesamtnote
star star star star star
Intel Celeron N3010
Intel Celeron N3010

Vergleichen Sie AMD E2-3800 VS Intel Celeron N3010. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

AMD E2-3800 boasts a maximum frequency of 1.30 GHz GHz. 4 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 15 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Freigegeben in Q4/2013, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Celeron N3010 features a maximum frequency of 1.04 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 4 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q1/2016, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Unterschiede

AMD E2-3800 Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
AMD E2-3800
Einen Fehler melden
  • Höhere Taktfrequenz

    Rund um 20% höhere taktfrequenz

    1.30 GHz left arrow 1.04 GHz
  • Größere Anzahl von Kernen

    2 Mehr Kerne

    4 left arrow 2

Positionen in allen Ranglisten

Gemeinsame Standpunkte AMD E2-3800 CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.

  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1507 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1274 place
Intel Celeron N3010 Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
Intel Celeron N3010
Einen Fehler melden
  • Platz in der Gesamtwertung

    (basierend auf mehreren Benchmarks)

    1472 left arrow score
  • Leistung pro Watt

    About 0.27 weniger Wärmeentwicklung durch den Prozessor, W.

    4 W left arrow 15 W

Positionen in allen Ranglisten

Gemeinsame Standpunkte Intel Celeron N3010 CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    1042 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    1046 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1491 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    841 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    875 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    805 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    812 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    319 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1344 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    292 place

Specifications

Technische Daten
AMD E2-3800 AMD E2-3800
Intel Celeron N3010 Intel Celeron N3010
CPU-Familie und Gruppe

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Serie
    AMD E left arrow Intel Celeron
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 8
  • CPU Gruppe
    AMD E2-3000 left arrow Intel Celeron J3000/N3000
Technische Daten der CPU

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequenz
    1.30 GHz left arrow 1.04 GHz
  • CPU Kerne
    4 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (1 Kern)
    kein Turbo left arrow 2.24 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 2
  • Hyperthreading
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • Übertaktung
    Ja left arrow Nein
  • Zentrale Architektur
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU-Name
    AMD Radeon HD 8280 left arrow Intel HD Graphics 400
  • GPU frequency
    0.45 GHz left arrow 0.32 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    kein Turbo left arrow 0.60 GHz
  • Ausführungseinheiten
    2 left arrow 12
  • Shader
    128 left arrow 96
  • Max. GPU Memory
    2 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 3
  • Generation
    5 left arrow 8
  • DirectX Version
    11.1 left arrow 12
  • technisches verfahren
    28 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Datum der Veröffentlichung
    Q2/2013 left arrow Q1/2015
Hardware Codec Unterstützung

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • h264
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VP8
    Nein left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • AVC
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
Speicherspezifikationen & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Celeron N3010 und AMD E2-3800. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Speicher Typ
    DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM left arrow DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
  • ECC
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • Speicherkanäle
    1 left arrow 2
  • PCIe-Version
    left arrow 2.0
  • PCIe-Lanes
    left arrow 4
Verschlüsselung
  • AES-NI
    Ja left arrow Ja
Energieverbrauch

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD E2-3800 und Intel Celeron N3010 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    15 W left arrow 4 W
Technologien und Erweiterungen

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD E2-3800 und Intel Celeron N3010, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Befehlssatz (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualisierung
    AMD-V left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT
  • ISA-Erweiterungen
    SSE3, SSE4a left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    2.00 MB left arrow 2.00 MB
  • Architektur
    Llano (K10) left arrow Braswell
  • technisches verfahren
    28 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Steckdose
    N/A left arrow BGA 1170
  • Datum der Veröffentlichung
    Q4/2013 left arrow Q1/2016

Benchmarks (tests)

Leistungstests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD E2-3800 und Intel Celeron N3010.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Die Leistung der iGPU - der internen GPU in Spielen.
115
AMD E2-3800
126
Intel Celeron N3010
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark ist eine Testsuite, die komplexe mathematische Berechnungen durchführt, um die CPU-Leistung bei Dateikomprimierung, Verschlüsselung und physikbezogenen Aufgaben zu ermitteln.
1645
AMD E2-3800
1001
Intel Celeron N3010

Letzte Vergleiche