Select processor 1
Select processor 2
Matrox LUMA A310F
PNY NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Matrox LUMA A310F vs PNY NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2023
Matrox LUMA A310F
Matrox LUMA A310F
Released
Q4/2022
Overall score
star star star star star
PNY NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
PNY NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Comparison of Matrox LUMA A310F and PNY NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation Now is the perfect time to figure out which graphics card delivers the highest performance, what sets them apart, and the reasons behind those differences.

In front of you is a detailed comparison between the Matrox LUMA A310F and the PNY NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation to assist you in selecting the best card for your needs, we will examine their specifications, benchmark scores, and overall performance, guiding you toward an informed decision.

Comparing the Matrox LUMA A310F to the PNY NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation analyzing performance in various popular benchmarks highlights the key differences between these models. By understanding the distinctions between these two cards, you’ll be able to choose the best option for your needs, whether you’re a gamer, content creator, or someone seeking pure processing power..

Matrox LUMA A310F: boasts a maximum frequency of 2.000 GHz GHz + 6%. It is equipped with 4 GBGB of RAM. The memory type is GDDR6. It was released in Q2/2023.

PNY NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation: It has a maximum clock speed of 2.175 GHz GHz. It comes with 48 GBGB of memory. The memory type is GDDR6. Released in Q1 Q4/2022.

Differences

Videokards Reasons to consider
Matrox LUMA A310F
Report a bug

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Matrox LUMA A310F GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2982 place
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 8% better clock speed

    2.175 GHz left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • More memory

    92% more memory

    48 GB left arrow 4 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions PNY NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data

Specifications

Technical data
Matrox LUMA A310F Matrox LUMA A310F
PNY NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation PNY NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
General Information

This section provides a detailed comparison of the fundamental technical specifications of the graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310F and PNY NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation. It provides essential details like the GPU architecture, the number of processing units, and other key features that significantly influence the overall performance of the cards across different applications, including gaming and professional tasks..

  • Based on
    Intel Arc A310 Graphics left arrow NVIDIA RTX A6000 ADA
  • GPU Chip
    ACM-G11 (Alchemist) left arrow AD102 (Ada Lovelace)
  • Streaming Multiprocessors
    96 left arrow 142
  • Shader
    768 left arrow 18176
  • Render Output Units
    16 left arrow 192
  • Texture Units
    32 left arrow 568
  • Raytracing Cores
    6 left arrow 142
Memory Configuration

This section provides a comparison of the memory configurations of Matrox LUMA A310F and PNY NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation. It includes details such as the memory size, type (e.g., GDDR6, HBM2), and bandwidth, which are key factors that determine how efficiently the card handles large textures, data sets, and high-resolution tasks.Larger memory sizes are typically beneficial for demanding applications like 4K gaming and video editing.

  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 48 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Clock
    1.938 GHz left arrow 2.500 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    15.5 Gbps left arrow 20 Gbps
  • Memory bandwidth
    124 GB/s left arrow 960 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    64 bit left arrow 384 bit
Clock Speeds

This section focuses on comparing the clock speeds of Matrox LUMA A310F and PNY NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation. It covers both the base and boost clock speeds, which have a direct impact on GPU performance during demanding tasks. Higher clock speeds generally result in smoother frame rates in games and faster processing in compute-intensive applications..

  • Base Clock
    2.000 GHz left arrow 2.175 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    2.000 GHz left arrow 2.535 GHz
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    -- left arrow --
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

This section examines the thermal design of Matrox LUMA A310F and PNY NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation. It provides information on power consumption (in watts) and thermal output during normal use and overclocking. Effective thermal management is crucial for ensuring stable performance during extended gaming sessions or other intensive tasks..

  • TDP
    50 W-33 % left arrow 300 W (Reference)
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    -- left arrow 1 x 16-Pin
Cooling System

This section compares the cooling systems of Matrox LUMA A310F and PNY NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation. It includes details about the types of coolers (e.g., blower or open-air) and the number and size of fans, which play a crucial role in maintaining optimal temperatures during operation.Effective cooling is essential for preventing thermal throttling and extending the longevity of the GPU.

  • Fan-Type
    Radial left arrow Radial
  • Fan 1
    1 x 70 mm left arrow 1 x 70 mm
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
Interfaces

This section compares the connectivity options available on Matrox LUMA A310F and PNY NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation. This includes details on the number and types of ports, such as HDMI, DisplayPort, and others, which are crucial for connecting monitors and external devices..This information assists in identifying which card provides more flexible or up-to-date connectivity features..

  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • DP Ports
    4x DP v2.1 left arrow 4x DP v1.4a
  • DVI Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical Specifications

This section compares the technical specifications of Matrox LUMA A310F and PNY NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation. It highlights key features such as API support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, which are crucial for running modern games and applications efficiently.These specifications ensure compatibility and optimal performance across a wide range of software environments.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_2 (Ultimate)
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow Yes
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

This section compares the support for video codecs on Matrox LUMA A310F and PNY NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation. It highlights the built-in capabilities for compressing and decompressing video formats such as H.264, H.265 (HEVC), and VP9, which are important for tasks like video editing and streaming.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Dimensions

This section compares the physical dimensions of Matrox LUMA A310F and PNY NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation. It covers the size, weight, and slot requirements, which are key factors in ensuring compatibility with your PC case, particularly for smaller or more compact setups..

  • Length
    168 mm left arrow 267 mm
  • Height
    69 mm left arrow 112 mm
  • Width
    -- left arrow --
  • Width (Slots)
    1 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
Additional Information

This section provides additional information about Matrox LUMA A310F and PNY NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation. It covers aspects such as release dates, interface compatibility, and other unique features that might not be covered in other sections.This helps users make a more informed decision about the suitability of each card for their specific use case.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 8 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q2/2023 left arrow Q4/2022
  • Launch Price
    -- left arrow 7,349 $
  • Structure size
    6 nm left arrow 4 nm
  • Part-no
    LUMA-A310F left arrow VCNRTX6000ADA-PB
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

By reviewing the results from several well-known benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance differences between Matrox LUMA A310F and PNY NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation.

Compare the synthetic benchmark results and select the best graphics card for your needs!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
3.07
Matrox LUMA A310F
91.1
PNY NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Latest comparisons