Select processor 1
Select processor 2
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 LP
MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC

KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 LP vs MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2019
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 LP
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 LP
Released
Q2/2018
Overall score
star star star star star
MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC
MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC

Comparison of KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 LP and MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC Now is the perfect time to figure out which graphics card delivers the highest performance, what sets them apart, and the reasons behind those differences.

In front of you is a detailed comparison between the KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 LP and the MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC to assist you in selecting the best card for your needs, we will examine their specifications, benchmark scores, and overall performance, guiding you toward an informed decision.

Comparing the KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 LP to the MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC analyzing performance in various popular benchmarks highlights the key differences between these models. By understanding the distinctions between these two cards, you’ll be able to choose the best option for your needs, whether you’re a gamer, content creator, or someone seeking pure processing power..

KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 LP: boasts a maximum frequency of 1.485 GHz GHz + 6%. It is equipped with 4 GBGB of RAM. The memory type is GDDR5. It was released in Q2/2019.

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC: It has a maximum clock speed of 1.442 GHz+ 4 % GHz. It comes with 3 GBGB of memory. The memory type is GDDR5. Released in Q1 Q2/2018.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    2942 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 3% better clock speed

    1.485 GHz left arrow 1.442 GHz+ 4 %
  • More memory

    25% more memory

    4 GB left arrow 3 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 LP GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    2836 place
  • Battlefield 5
    2851 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2772 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    2875 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    2670 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    2953 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    2923 place
  • Battlefield 5
    2919 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2822 place

Specifications

Technical data
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 LP KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 LP
MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC
General Information

This section provides a detailed comparison of the fundamental technical specifications of the graphics cards KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 LP and MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC. It provides essential details like the GPU architecture, the number of processing units, and other key features that significantly influence the overall performance of the cards across different applications, including gaming and professional tasks..

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR5) left arrow NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
  • GPU Chip
    TU117-300-A1 left arrow GP107-301-A1
  • Execution units
    14 left arrow 6
  • Shader
    896 left arrow 768
  • Render Output Units
    32 left arrow 24
  • Texture Units
    56 left arrow 48
Memory Configuration

This section provides a comparison of the memory configurations of KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 LP and MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC. It includes details such as the memory size, type (e.g., GDDR6, HBM2), and bandwidth, which are key factors that determine how efficiently the card handles large textures, data sets, and high-resolution tasks.Larger memory sizes are typically beneficial for demanding applications like 4K gaming and video editing.

  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 3 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR5 left arrow GDDR5
  • Memory Speed
    2 GHz left arrow 1.752 GHz
  • Memory Bandwith
    128 GB/s left arrow 84 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    128 bit left arrow 96 bit
Clock Speeds

This section focuses on comparing the clock speeds of KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 LP and MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC. It covers both the base and boost clock speeds, which have a direct impact on GPU performance during demanding tasks. Higher clock speeds generally result in smoother frame rates in games and faster processing in compute-intensive applications..

  • Base Clock
    1.485 GHz left arrow 1.442 GHz+ 4 %
  • Boost Clock
    1.680 GHz+ 1 % left arrow 1.582 GHz+ 4 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    1.665 GHz left arrow
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

This section examines the thermal design of KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 LP and MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC. It provides information on power consumption (in watts) and thermal output during normal use and overclocking. Effective thermal management is crucial for ensuring stable performance during extended gaming sessions or other intensive tasks..

  • TDP
    75 W left arrow 75 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    1 x 6-Pin left arrow
Cooling System

This section compares the cooling systems of KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 LP and MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC. It includes details about the types of coolers (e.g., blower or open-air) and the number and size of fans, which play a crucial role in maintaining optimal temperatures during operation.Effective cooling is essential for preventing thermal throttling and extending the longevity of the GPU.

  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Fan 1
    2 x 50 mm left arrow 2 x 80 mm
  • Noise (Idle)
    -- left arrow --
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
Interfaces

This section compares the connectivity options available on KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 LP and MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC. This includes details on the number and types of ports, such as HDMI, DisplayPort, and others, which are crucial for connecting monitors and external devices..This information assists in identifying which card provides more flexible or up-to-date connectivity features..

  • Max. Displays
    3 left arrow 3
  • HDCP-Version
    2.2 left arrow 2.2
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.0b left arrow 1x HDMI v2.0b
  • DP Ports
    1x DP v1.4 left arrow 1x DP v1.4
  • DVI Ports
    1 left arrow 1
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical Specifications

This section compares the technical specifications of KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 LP and MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC. It highlights key features such as API support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, which are crucial for running modern games and applications efficiently.These specifications ensure compatibility and optimal performance across a wide range of software environments.

  • Max. resolution
    3840x2160 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_1 left arrow 12_1
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

This section compares the support for video codecs on KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 LP and MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC. It highlights the built-in capabilities for compressing and decompressing video formats such as H.264, H.265 (HEVC), and VP9, which are important for tasks like video editing and streaming.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
Dimensions

This section compares the physical dimensions of KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 LP and MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC. It covers the size, weight, and slot requirements, which are key factors in ensuring compatibility with your PC case, particularly for smaller or more compact setups..

  • Length
    182 mm left arrow 215 mm
  • Height
    121 mm left arrow 112 mm
  • Width
    39 mm left arrow 38 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow 448 g
Additional Information

This section provides additional information about KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 LP and MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC. It covers aspects such as release dates, interface compatibility, and other unique features that might not be covered in other sections.This helps users make a more informed decision about the suitability of each card for their specific use case.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 3.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q2/2019 left arrow Q2/2018
  • Release price
    -- left arrow --
  • Structure size
    12 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Part-no
    TBA left arrow --
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

By reviewing the results from several well-known benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance differences between KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 LP and MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC.

Compare the synthetic benchmark results and select the best graphics card for your needs!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
3.01
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 LP
2.43
MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC
Battlefield 5
Battlefield 5 is a realistic game, with a built-in benchmark, very suitable as a test for graphics cards
20 fps (avg)
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 LP
16 fps (avg)
MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider has a built-in benchmark, based on the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine
12 fps (avg)
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 LP
10 fps (avg)
MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC

Latest comparisons