Select processor 1
Select processor 2
INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G

INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact vs GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2022
INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact
INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact
Released
Q2/2018
Overall score
star star star star star
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G

Comparison of INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact and GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G Now is the perfect time to figure out which graphics card delivers the highest performance, what sets them apart, and the reasons behind those differences.

In front of you is a detailed comparison between the INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact and the GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G to assist you in selecting the best card for your needs, we will examine their specifications, benchmark scores, and overall performance, guiding you toward an informed decision.

Comparing the INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact to the GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G analyzing performance in various popular benchmarks highlights the key differences between these models. By understanding the distinctions between these two cards, you’ll be able to choose the best option for your needs, whether you’re a gamer, content creator, or someone seeking pure processing power..

INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact: boasts a maximum frequency of 1.740 GHz GHz + 6%. It is equipped with 4 GBGB of RAM. The memory type is GDDR6. It was released in Q2/2022.

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G: It has a maximum clock speed of 1.417 GHz+ 2 % GHz. It comes with 3 GBGB of memory. The memory type is GDDR5. Released in Q1 Q2/2018.

Differences

  • Higher clock speed

    Around 19% better clock speed

    1.740 GHz left arrow 1.417 GHz+ 2 %
  • More memory

    25% more memory

    4 GB left arrow 3 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    3062 place
  • 3DMark Benchmark
    2234 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    2958 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    2925 place
  • Battlefield 5
    2924 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2825 place

Specifications

Technical data
INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G
General Information

This section provides a detailed comparison of the fundamental technical specifications of the graphics cards INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact and GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G. It provides essential details like the GPU architecture, the number of processing units, and other key features that significantly influence the overall performance of the cards across different applications, including gaming and professional tasks..

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 left arrow NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
  • GPU Chip
    TU117-150 (Turing) left arrow GP107-301-A1
  • Execution units
    8 left arrow 6
  • Shader
    512 left arrow 768
  • Render Output Units
    16 left arrow 24
  • Texture Units
    32 left arrow 48
Memory Configuration

This section provides a comparison of the memory configurations of INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact and GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G. It includes details such as the memory size, type (e.g., GDDR6, HBM2), and bandwidth, which are key factors that determine how efficiently the card handles large textures, data sets, and high-resolution tasks.Larger memory sizes are typically beneficial for demanding applications like 4K gaming and video editing.

  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 3 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR5
  • Memory Speed
    12 Gbps left arrow 1.752 GHz
  • Memory Bandwith
    96 GB/s left arrow 84 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    64 bit left arrow 96 bit
Clock Speeds

This section focuses on comparing the clock speeds of INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact and GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G. It covers both the base and boost clock speeds, which have a direct impact on GPU performance during demanding tasks. Higher clock speeds generally result in smoother frame rates in games and faster processing in compute-intensive applications..

  • Base Clock
    1.740 GHz left arrow 1.417 GHz+ 2 %
  • Boost Clock
    1.785 GHz left arrow 1.582 GHz+ 4 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    left arrow 1.556 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

This section examines the thermal design of INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact and GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G. It provides information on power consumption (in watts) and thermal output during normal use and overclocking. Effective thermal management is crucial for ensuring stable performance during extended gaming sessions or other intensive tasks..

  • TDP
    75 W left arrow 75 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    90 °C left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    left arrow
Cooling System

This section compares the cooling systems of INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact and GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G. It includes details about the types of coolers (e.g., blower or open-air) and the number and size of fans, which play a crucial role in maintaining optimal temperatures during operation.Effective cooling is essential for preventing thermal throttling and extending the longevity of the GPU.

  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    1 x 90 mm left arrow 2 x 80 mm
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    -- left arrow --
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
Interfaces

This section compares the connectivity options available on INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact and GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G. This includes details on the number and types of ports, such as HDMI, DisplayPort, and others, which are crucial for connecting monitors and external devices..This information assists in identifying which card provides more flexible or up-to-date connectivity features..

  • Max. Displays
    3 left arrow 3
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.2
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.0b left arrow 1x HDMI v2.0b
  • DP Ports
    2x DP v1.4a left arrow 1x DP v1.4
  • DVI Ports
    -- left arrow 1
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical Specifications

This section compares the technical specifications of INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact and GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G. It highlights key features such as API support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, which are crucial for running modern games and applications efficiently.These specifications ensure compatibility and optimal performance across a wide range of software environments.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_1 left arrow 12_1
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    Yes left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

This section compares the support for video codecs on INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact and GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G. It highlights the built-in capabilities for compressing and decompressing video formats such as H.264, H.265 (HEVC), and VP9, which are important for tasks like video editing and streaming.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow No
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
Dimensions

This section compares the physical dimensions of INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact and GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G. It covers the size, weight, and slot requirements, which are key factors in ensuring compatibility with your PC case, particularly for smaller or more compact setups..

  • Length
    196 mm left arrow 191 mm
  • Height
    113 mm left arrow 111 mm
  • Width
    -- left arrow 36 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
Additional Information

This section provides additional information about INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact and GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G. It covers aspects such as release dates, interface compatibility, and other unique features that might not be covered in other sections.This helps users make a more informed decision about the suitability of each card for their specific use case.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3.0 x 8 left arrow PCIe 3.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q2/2022 left arrow Q2/2018
  • Release price
    -- left arrow --
  • Structure size
    12 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Part-no
    N16301-04D6-1177VA19 left arrow GV-N1050OC-3GD
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

By reviewing the results from several well-known benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance differences between INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact and GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G.

Compare the synthetic benchmark results and select the best graphics card for your needs!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
1.83
INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact
2.43
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G

Latest comparisons