Select processor 1
Select processor 2
GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G vs Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2021
GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G
GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G
Released
Q1/2021
Overall score
star star star star star
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT

Comparison of GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G and Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT Now is the perfect time to figure out which graphics card delivers the highest performance, what sets them apart, and the reasons behind those differences.

In front of you is a detailed comparison between the GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G and the Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT to assist you in selecting the best card for your needs, we will examine their specifications, benchmark scores, and overall performance, guiding you toward an informed decision.

Comparing the GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G to the Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT analyzing performance in various popular benchmarks highlights the key differences between these models. By understanding the distinctions between these two cards, you’ll be able to choose the best option for your needs, whether you’re a gamer, content creator, or someone seeking pure processing power..

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G: boasts a maximum frequency of 1.825 GHz GHz + 6%. It is equipped with 16 GBGB of RAM. The memory type is GDDR6. It was released in Q2/2021.

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT: It has a maximum clock speed of 1.875 GHz+ 3 % GHz. It comes with 16 GBGB of memory. The memory type is GDDR6. Released in Q1 Q1/2021.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    366 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    365 place
  • Battlefield 5
    211 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    369 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
    369 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    691 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    627 place
  • 3DMark Benchmark
    233 place
  • Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    406 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    403 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 3% better clock speed

    1.875 GHz+ 3 % left arrow 1.825 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    458 place
  • Battlefield 5
    369 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    401 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
    343 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    727 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    470 place
  • 3DMark Benchmark
    373 place
  • Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    321 place

Specifications

Technical data
GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT
General Information

This section provides a detailed comparison of the fundamental technical specifications of the graphics cards GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G and Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT. It provides essential details like the GPU architecture, the number of processing units, and other key features that significantly influence the overall performance of the cards across different applications, including gaming and professional tasks..

  • Based on
    AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT left arrow AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
  • GPU Chip
    Navi 21 left arrow Navi 21 XT
  • Execution units
    80 left arrow 72
  • Shader
    5120 left arrow 4608
  • Render Output Units
    128 left arrow 128
  • Texture Units
    320 left arrow 288
Memory Configuration

This section provides a comparison of the memory configurations of GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G and Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT. It includes details such as the memory size, type (e.g., GDDR6, HBM2), and bandwidth, which are key factors that determine how efficiently the card handles large textures, data sets, and high-resolution tasks.Larger memory sizes are typically beneficial for demanding applications like 4K gaming and video editing.

  • Memory Size
    16 GB left arrow 16 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Speed
    2 GHz left arrow 2 GHz
  • Memory Bandwith
    512 GB/s left arrow 512 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    256 bit left arrow 256 bit
Clock Speeds

This section focuses on comparing the clock speeds of GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G and Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT. It covers both the base and boost clock speeds, which have a direct impact on GPU performance during demanding tasks. Higher clock speeds generally result in smoother frame rates in games and faster processing in compute-intensive applications..

  • Base Clock
    1.825 GHz left arrow 1.875 GHz+ 3 %
  • Boost Clock
    2.250 GHz left arrow 2.310 GHz+ 3 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    2.015 GHz left arrow 2.065 GHz+ 2 %
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

This section examines the thermal design of GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G and Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT. It provides information on power consumption (in watts) and thermal output during normal use and overclocking. Effective thermal management is crucial for ensuring stable performance during extended gaming sessions or other intensive tasks..

  • TDP
    300 W left arrow 300 W
  • TDP (up)
    345 W left arrow 345 W
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow 96 °C
  • PCIe-Power
    2 x 8-Pin left arrow 2 x 8-Pin
Cooling System

This section compares the cooling systems of GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G and Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT. It includes details about the types of coolers (e.g., blower or open-air) and the number and size of fans, which play a crucial role in maintaining optimal temperatures during operation.Effective cooling is essential for preventing thermal throttling and extending the longevity of the GPU.

  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Fan 1
    3 x 80 mm left arrow 3 x 90 mm
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow 36-37 dB
Interfaces

This section compares the connectivity options available on GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G and Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT. This includes details on the number and types of ports, such as HDMI, DisplayPort, and others, which are crucial for connecting monitors and external devices..This information assists in identifying which card provides more flexible or up-to-date connectivity features..

  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.1 left arrow 1x HDMI v2.1
  • DP Ports
    2x DP v1.4a left arrow 3x DP v1.4a
  • DVI Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    1 left arrow --
Technical Specifications

This section compares the technical specifications of GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G and Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT. It highlights key features such as API support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, which are crucial for running modern games and applications efficiently.These specifications ensure compatibility and optimal performance across a wide range of software environments.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 left arrow 12_2
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    Non addressable LED left arrow Addressable LED
Supported Video Codecs

This section compares the support for video codecs on GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G and Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT. It highlights the built-in capabilities for compressing and decompressing video formats such as H.264, H.265 (HEVC), and VP9, which are important for tasks like video editing and streaming.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode left arrow Decode
Dimensions

This section compares the physical dimensions of GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G and Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT. It covers the size, weight, and slot requirements, which are key factors in ensuring compatibility with your PC case, particularly for smaller or more compact setups..

  • Length
    267 mm left arrow 313 mm
  • Height
    120 mm left arrow 135 mm
  • Width
    49 mm left arrow 53 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    3 PCIe-Slots left arrow 3 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
Additional Information

This section provides additional information about GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G and Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT. It covers aspects such as release dates, interface compatibility, and other unique features that might not be covered in other sections.This helps users make a more informed decision about the suitability of each card for their specific use case.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q2/2021 left arrow Q1/2021
  • Release price
    -- left arrow 779 $
  • Structure size
    7 nm left arrow 7 nm
  • Part-no
    GV-R69XT-16GC-B left arrow 11304-03-20G
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

By reviewing the results from several well-known benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance differences between GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G and Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT.

Compare the synthetic benchmark results and select the best graphics card for your needs!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
23.04
GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G
21.29
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT
3DMark Benchmark
3DMark is designed for gamers, overclockers and system builders who want to get the most out of their hardware
18511
GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G
17644
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT
Battlefield 5
Battlefield 5 is a realistic game, with a built-in benchmark, very suitable as a test for graphics cards
110 fps (avg)
GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G
104 fps (avg)
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider has a built-in benchmark, based on the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine
76 fps (avg)
GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G
70 fps (avg)
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT
Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
Ethash is an algorithm for mining Ethereum cryptocurrency that makes the most of the GPU
63 MH/s
GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G
63 MH/s
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT
Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
The Autolykos algorithm, on which Ergo cryptocurrency is based, allows not only modern GPUs to be used for mining, but also the past generation of GPUs
122 MH/s
GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G
120 MH/s
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT
Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
Hashrate mining Ravencoin cryptocurrency on the KawPoW algorithm is fastest on modern video cards
29 MH/s
GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G
32 MH/s
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT
Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s)
VertCoin cryptocurrency can be mined on both Nvidia and AMD and is interesting because it mines perfectly on old GPUs like GTX1050, R9 290 and even GTX970
0.86 MH/s
GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT 16G
0.94 MH/s
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 XT

Latest comparisons