Intel Core m3-6Y30
Intel Atom x7-E3950
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Core m3-6Y30 vs Intel Atom x7-E3950. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2015
Intel Core m3-6Y30
Intel Core m3-6Y30
Released
Q4/2016
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Atom x7-E3950
Intel Atom x7-E3950

Compare Intel Core m3-6Y30 VS Intel Atom x7-E3950. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Intel Core m3-6Y30 boasts a maximum frequency of 0.90 GHz GHz. 2 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 4.5 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q3/2015, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Atom x7-E3950 features a maximum frequency of 1.60 GHz GHz. 4 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 12 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q4/2016, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1197 left arrow score
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 9% better overclocked clock speed

    2.20 GHz left arrow 2.00 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    times less performance per watt

    4.5 W left arrow 12 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Core m3-6Y30 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    561 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    516 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    837 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    918 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1113 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    568 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    694 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    415 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    586 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    286 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1113 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1571 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 44% better clock speed

    1.60 GHz left arrow 0.90 GHz
  • More number of cores

    About 2 times more cores

    4 left arrow 2

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Atom x7-E3950 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    581 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    518 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    1033 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    1014 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1386 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1349 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1367 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1366 place
  • CoreMark
    7 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Core m3-6Y30 Intel Core m3-6Y30
Intel Atom x7-E3950 Intel Atom x7-E3950
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    Intel Core M left arrow Intel Atom
  • Generation
    6 left arrow 1
  • CPU group
    Intel Core M 6 left arrow Intel Atom x3/x5/x7
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequency
    0.90 GHz left arrow 1.60 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    2.20 GHz left arrow 2.00 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 4
  • Hyperthreading
    Yes left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    Intel HD Graphics 515 left arrow Intel HD Graphics 505
  • GPU frequency
    0.30 GHz left arrow 0.50 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.85 GHz left arrow 0.65 GHz
  • Execution units
    24 left arrow 18
  • Shader
    192 left arrow 144
  • Max. GPU Memory
    16 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow 3
  • Generation
    9 left arrow 9
  • DirectX Version
    12 left arrow 12
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Release date
    Q3/2015 left arrow Q3/2016
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Atom x7-E3950 and Intel Core m3-6Y30. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    LPDDR3-1866 left arrow LPDDR3-1866
  • Max. Memory
    left arrow 8 GB
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 4
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow 2.0
  • PCIe lanes
    10 left arrow 6
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Core m3-6Y30 and Intel Atom x7-E3950 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    4.5 W left arrow 12 W
  • Tjunction max.
    -- left arrow 110 °C
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Core m3-6Y30 and Intel Atom x7-E3950, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    4.00 MB left arrow 2.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Skylake Y left arrow Cherry Trail
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Socket
    BGA 1515 left arrow BGA 1296
  • Release date
    Q3/2015 left arrow Q4/2016

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Core m3-6Y30 and Intel Atom x7-E3950.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 SC is a high load CPU test for long tasks on a desktop or notebook PC, uses one CPU core, with no hypetrading
159
Intel Core m3-6Y30
94
Intel Atom x7-E3950
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 MC is a high load CPU test for long tasks on a desktop or notebook PC, using a multi-core and hyperthreading
278
Intel Core m3-6Y30
275
Intel Atom x7-E3950
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench R15 SC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
92
Intel Core m3-6Y30
40
Intel Atom x7-E3950
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
185
Intel Core m3-6Y30
124
Intel Atom x7-E3950
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games
326
Intel Core m3-6Y30
187
Intel Atom x7-E3950
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
2704
Intel Core m3-6Y30
823
Intel Atom x7-E3950

Latest comparisons