Intel Core i5-13400F
AMD EPYC 9354
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Core i5-13400F vs AMD EPYC 9354. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2023
Intel Core i5-13400F
Intel Core i5-13400F
Released
Q4/2022
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD EPYC 9354
AMD EPYC 9354

Compare Intel Core i5-13400F VS AMD EPYC 9354. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Intel Core i5-13400F boasts a maximum frequency of 2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz) GHz. 10 / 16 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 65 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q1/2023, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

AMD EPYC 9354 features a maximum frequency of 3.25 GHz GHz. 32 / 64 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 280 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q4/2022, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    128 left arrow score
  • Performance per watt

    times less performance per watt

    65 W left arrow 280 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Core i5-13400F CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    58 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    80 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    163 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    211 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    79 place
AMD EPYC 9354 Reasons to consider
AMD EPYC 9354
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 23% better clock speed

    3.25 GHz left arrow 2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz)
  • More number of cores

    About 3.2 times more cores

    32 left arrow 10

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD EPYC 9354 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Core i5-13400F Intel Core i5-13400F
AMD EPYC 9354 AMD EPYC 9354
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Family
    Intel Core i5 left arrow AMD EPYC
  • CPU group
    Intel Core i 13000 left arrow AMD EPYC 9004
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Generation
    13 left arrow 4
  • Predecessor
    Intel Core i5-12400 left arrow --
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • CPU Cores / Threads
    10 / 16 left arrow 32 / 64
  • Core architecture
    hybrid (big.LITTLE) left arrow normal
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    No left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD EPYC 9354 and Intel Core i5-13400F. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    DDR5-4800 left arrow DDR5-4800
  • Max. Memory
    128 GB left arrow 6144 GB
  • Memory channels
    2 (Dual Channel) left arrow 12
  • Bandwidth
    89.6 GB/s left arrow 461.0 GB/s
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • PCIe
    5.0 x 20 left arrow 5.0 x 128
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD EPYC 9354 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    65 W left arrow 280 W
  • TDP (PL2)
    117 W left arrow --
  • TDP up
    -- left arrow 300 W
  • TDP down
    -- left arrow 240 W
  • Tjunction max.
    100 °C left arrow 100 °C
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD EPYC 9354, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Technology
    10 nm left arrow 5 nm
  • Chip design
    Monolithic left arrow Chiplet
  • Socket
    LGA 1700 left arrow SP5
  • L2-Cache
    20.00 MB left arrow 32.00 MB
  • L3-Cache
    20.00 MB left arrow 256.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Alder Lake S Refresh left arrow Genoa (Zen 4)
  • Operating systems
    Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux left arrow Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow AMD-V, SVM
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+ left arrow SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI
  • Release date
    Q1/2023 left arrow Q4/2022
  • Release price
    -- left arrow 3420 $
  • Part Number
    -- left arrow 100-000000798
  • Documents
    -- left arrow Technical data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD EPYC 9354.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Latest comparisons