Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505
Intel Core2 Duo E7500
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 vs Intel Core2 Duo E7500. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2009
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505
Released
Q1/2009
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Core2 Duo E7500
Intel Core2 Duo E7500

Compare Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 VS Intel Core2 Duo E7500. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 boasts a maximum frequency of 2.83 GHz GHz. 4 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 95 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q3/2009, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Core2 Duo E7500 features a maximum frequency of 2.93 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 65 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q1/2009, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1425 left arrow score
  • More number of cores

    2 times more cores

    4 left arrow 2

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    399 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    373 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1185 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1100 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1213 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1793 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 3% better clock speed

    2.93 GHz left arrow 2.83 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.68 times less performance per watt

    65 W left arrow 95 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Core2 Duo E7500 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1188 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1374 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1334 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505
Intel Core2 Duo E7500 Intel Core2 Duo E7500
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop left arrow Desktop
  • Family
    Intel Core2 Duo left arrow Intel Core2 Duo
  • Generation
    2 left arrow 2
  • CPU group
    Intel Core 2 Quad Q8000/Q9000 left arrow Intel Core 2 Duo E7000/E8000
  • Predecessor
    No left arrow No
  • Successor
    No left arrow No
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequency
    2.83 GHz left arrow 2.93 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    No left arrow No
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (2 Cores)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Core2 Duo E7500 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    DDR2-800 / DDR3-1066 left arrow DDR2-1066 / DDR3-1333
  • Max. Memory
    16 GB left arrow 16 GB
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • PCIe
    No data left arrow No data
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow No
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Intel Core2 Duo E7500 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    95 W left arrow 65 W
  • TDP up
    No left arrow No
  • TDP (PL2)
    No left arrow No
  • TDP down
    No left arrow No
  • Tjunction max.
    90 °C left arrow 80 °C
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Intel Core2 Duo E7500, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d left arrow VT-x
  • ISA extensions
    MMX, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1 left arrow MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE 4.1
  • L2-Cache
    6.00 MB left arrow 3.00 MB
  • L3-Cache
    No left arrow No
  • Architecture
    Yorkfield left arrow Wolfdale
  • Technology
    45 nm left arrow 45 nm
  • Socket
    LGA 775 left arrow LGA 775
  • Release date
    Q3/2009 left arrow Q1/2009

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Intel Core2 Duo E7500.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
460
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505
455
Intel Core2 Duo E7500
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
1486
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505
817
Intel Core2 Duo E7500
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
2017
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505
1076
Intel Core2 Duo E7500

Latest comparisons