Intel Celeron G1610T
Intel Celeron G1620
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Celeron G1610T vs Intel Celeron G1620. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2013
Intel Celeron G1610T
Intel Celeron G1610T
Released
Q1/2013
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Celeron G1620
Intel Celeron G1620

Compare Intel Celeron G1610T VS Intel Celeron G1620. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Intel Celeron G1610T boasts a maximum frequency of 2.30 GHz GHz. 2 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 35 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q1/2013, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Celeron G1620 features a maximum frequency of 2.70 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 55 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q1/2013, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1579 left arrow score
  • Performance per watt

    times less performance per watt

    35 W left arrow 55 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron G1610T CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    890 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    965 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1224 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1414 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1569 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    678 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    781 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    764 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    782 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    366 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1176 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1474 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 15% better clock speed

    2.70 GHz left arrow 2.30 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron G1620 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    822 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    923 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1119 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1335 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1570 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    578 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    722 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    518 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    697 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    365 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1110 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Celeron G1610T Intel Celeron G1610T
Intel Celeron G1620 Intel Celeron G1620
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    Intel Celeron left arrow Intel Celeron
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 3
  • CPU group
    Intel Celeron G1000 left arrow Intel Celeron G1000
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequency
    2.30 GHz left arrow 2.70 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (2 Cores)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) left arrow Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1)
  • GPU frequency
    0.65 GHz left arrow 0.65 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    1.05 GHz left arrow 1.05 GHz
  • Execution units
    6 left arrow 6
  • Shader
    48 left arrow 48
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow 3
  • Generation
    7 left arrow 7
  • DirectX Version
    11.0 left arrow 11.0
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow 22 nm
  • Release date
    Q4/2012 left arrow Q4/2012
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode left arrow Decode
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Celeron G1620 and Intel Celeron G1610T. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1333 left arrow DDR3-1333
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    2.0 left arrow 2.0
  • PCIe lanes
    16 left arrow 16
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Celeron G1610T and Intel Celeron G1620 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    35 W left arrow 55 W
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Celeron G1610T and Intel Celeron G1620, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    2.00 MB left arrow 2.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Ivy Bridge S left arrow Ivy Bridge S
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow 22 nm
  • Socket
    LGA 1155 left arrow LGA 1155
  • Release date
    Q1/2013 left arrow Q1/2013

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Celeron G1610T and Intel Celeron G1620.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench R15 SC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
81
Intel Celeron G1610T
95
Intel Celeron G1620
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
154
Intel Celeron G1610T
180
Intel Celeron G1620
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
411
Intel Celeron G1610T
512
Intel Celeron G1620
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
743
Intel Celeron G1610T
951
Intel Celeron G1620
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games
101
Intel Celeron G1610T
101
Intel Celeron G1620
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
1789
Intel Celeron G1610T
2200
Intel Celeron G1620
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
3117
Intel Celeron G1610T
3645
Intel Celeron G1620
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D
0.86
Intel Celeron G1610T
1.04
Intel Celeron G1620
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D
1.7
Intel Celeron G1610T
1.99
Intel Celeron G1620
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
The iGPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene, based on CINEMA 4D
8.8
Intel Celeron G1610T
8.8
Intel Celeron G1620
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
2256
Intel Celeron G1610T
2743
Intel Celeron G1620

Latest comparisons