Baikal-S
AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Baikal-S vs AMD Ryzen 3 5300G. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2022
Baikal-S
Baikal-S
Released
Q2/2021
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300G

Compare Baikal-S VS AMD Ryzen 3 5300G. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Baikal-S boasts a maximum frequency of 2.2 GHz GHz. 48 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 120 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q1/2022, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 3 5300G features a maximum frequency of 4.00 GHz GHz. 4 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 65 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q2/2021, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

Baikal-S Reasons to consider
Baikal-S
Report a bug
  • More number of cores

    44 times more cores

    48 left arrow 4

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Baikal-S CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    124 place
  • CoreMark
    1 place
AMD Ryzen 3 5300G Reasons to consider
AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 45% better clock speed

    4.00 GHz left arrow 2.2 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.54 times less performance per watt

    65 W left arrow 120 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen 3 5300G CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    288 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    240 place

Specifications

Technical data
Baikal-S Baikal-S
AMD Ryzen 3 5300G AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    Baikal left arrow AMD Ryzen
  • CPU group
    Baikal-S left arrow AMD Ryzen 5000G
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequency
    2.2 GHz left arrow 4.00 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    48 left arrow 4
  • CPU Threads
    48 left arrow 8
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen 3 5300G and Baikal-S. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    DDR43-3200 left arrow DDR4-3200
  • Max. Memory
    768 left arrow 64 GB
  • Memory channels
    6 left arrow 2
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow No
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Baikal-S and AMD Ryzen 3 5300G to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    120 W left arrow 65 W
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Baikal-S and AMD Ryzen 3 5300G, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Technology
    16 nm left arrow 7 nm
  • Architecture
    CortexA75 left arrow Cezanne (Zen 3)
  • L2-Cache
    512 KB left arrow 3.00 MB
  • L3-Cache
    2 MB left arrow 16.00 MB
  • Socket
    FCLGA-3467 left arrow AM4
  • Release date
    Q1/2022 left arrow Q2/2021

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Baikal-S and AMD Ryzen 3 5300G.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Latest comparisons