AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2019
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
Released
Q4/2019
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF

Compare AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U VS AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U boasts a maximum frequency of 2.10 GHz GHz. 4 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 15 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q1/2019, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF features a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz GHz. 6 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 65 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q4/2019, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    891 left arrow score
  • Performance per watt

    times less performance per watt

    15 W left arrow 65 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    447 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    555 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    563 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    959 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    902 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    371 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    180 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    320 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    117 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    382 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    730 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    237 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    641 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 34% better clock speed

    3.20 GHz left arrow 2.10 GHz
  • More number of cores

    About 1.5 times more cores

    6 left arrow 4
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 3 % better overclocked clock speed

    3.60 GHz left arrow 3.50 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    324 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    233 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    228 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    461 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    254 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    594 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    505 place
  • Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
    94 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    442 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD Ryzen left arrow AMD Ryzen
  • Generation
    2 left arrow 2
  • CPU group
    AMD Ryzen 3000U left arrow AMD Ryzen 2000
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequency
    2.10 GHz left arrow 3.20 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 6
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    3.50 GHz left arrow 3.60 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 12
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon Vega 6 Graphics left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU frequency
    1.10 GHz left arrow
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    6 left arrow
  • Shader
    384 left arrow
  • Max. GPU Memory
    2 GB left arrow --
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow
  • Generation
    8 left arrow
  • DirectX Version
    12 left arrow
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow
  • Release date
    Q1/2018 left arrow
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-2400 left arrow DDR4-2666
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow 3.0
  • PCIe lanes
    12 left arrow 20
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    15 W left arrow 65 W
  • TDP up
    35 W left arrow --
  • TDP down
    12 W left arrow --
  • Tjunction max.
    105 °C left arrow 95 °C
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V, SVM left arrow AMD-V, SVM
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
  • L3-Cache
    4.00 MB left arrow 16.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Picasso (Zen+) left arrow Pinnacle Ridge (Zen+)
  • Technology
    12 nm left arrow 12 nm
  • Socket
    FP5 left arrow AM4
  • Release date
    Q1/2019 left arrow Q4/2019

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench R15 SC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
138
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
148
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
510
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
1221
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
670
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
941
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
2367
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
5241
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF

Latest comparisons