AMD Phenom II X2 565
AMD Phenom II X4 925
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD Phenom II X2 565 vs AMD Phenom II X4 925. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2010
AMD Phenom II X2 565
AMD Phenom II X2 565
Released
Q2/2009
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD Phenom II X4 925
AMD Phenom II X4 925

Compare AMD Phenom II X2 565 VS AMD Phenom II X4 925. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

AMD Phenom II X2 565 boasts a maximum frequency of 3.40 GHz GHz. 2 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 80 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q4/2010, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

AMD Phenom II X4 925 features a maximum frequency of 2.80 GHz GHz. 4 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 95 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q2/2009, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1250 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 18% better clock speed

    3.40 GHz left arrow 2.80 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    times less performance per watt

    80 W left arrow 95 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Phenom II X2 565 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    852 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    931 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    669 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    747 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    129 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    571 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1187 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1458 left arrow score
  • More number of cores

    About 2 times more cores

    4 left arrow 2

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Phenom II X4 925 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    924 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    763 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1302 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1276 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    745 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    600 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    706 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    539 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1020 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD Phenom II X2 565 AMD Phenom II X2 565
AMD Phenom II X4 925 AMD Phenom II X4 925
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD Phenom II left arrow AMD Phenom II
  • Generation
    2 left arrow 4
  • CPU group
    AMD Phenom II - 545 left arrow AMD Phenom II - 800/900
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequency
    3.40 GHz left arrow 2.80 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 4
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    No left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD Phenom II X4 925 and AMD Phenom II X2 565. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    DDR2-1066 left arrow DDR2-1066
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow No
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD Phenom II X2 565 and AMD Phenom II X4 925 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    80 W left arrow 95 W
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD Phenom II X2 565 and AMD Phenom II X4 925, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow AMD-V
  • ISA extensions
    SSE3, SSE4a left arrow SSE3, SSE4a
  • L3-Cache
    6.00 MB left arrow 6.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Callisto (K10) left arrow Deneb (K10)
  • Technology
    45 nm left arrow 45 nm
  • Socket
    AM3 left arrow AM3
  • Release date
    Q4/2010 left arrow Q2/2009

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD Phenom II X2 565 and AMD Phenom II X4 925.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench R15 SC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
89
AMD Phenom II X2 565
74
AMD Phenom II X4 925
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
172
AMD Phenom II X2 565
284
AMD Phenom II X4 925
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
1834
AMD Phenom II X2 565
1495
AMD Phenom II X4 925
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
3381
AMD Phenom II X2 565
5236
AMD Phenom II X4 925
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D
1.03
AMD Phenom II X2 565
0.85
AMD Phenom II X4 925
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D
2.02
AMD Phenom II X2 565
3.34
AMD Phenom II X4 925
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
2188
AMD Phenom II X2 565
3489
AMD Phenom II X4 925

Latest comparisons