AMD Opteron X3421
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD Opteron X3421 vs Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2015
AMD Opteron X3421
AMD Opteron X3421
Released
Q1/2016
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4

Compare AMD Opteron X3421 VS Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

AMD Opteron X3421 boasts a maximum frequency of 2.10 GHz GHz. 4 / 4 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 15 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q2/2015, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 features a maximum frequency of 2.20 GHz GHz. 18 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 120 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q1/2016, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

AMD Opteron X3421 Reasons to consider
AMD Opteron X3421
Report a bug
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 3% better overclocked clock speed

    3.40 GHz left arrow 3.30 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    times less performance per watt

    15 W left arrow 120 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Opteron X3421 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    393 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    416 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 5% better clock speed

    2.20 GHz left arrow 2.10 GHz
  • More number of cores

    About 4.5 times more cores

    18 left arrow 4

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    562 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    99 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    629 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    126 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    211 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    32 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    264 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    42 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    251 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD Opteron X3421 AMD Opteron X3421
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Family
    AMD Opteron left arrow Intel Xeon E5
  • CPU group
    AMD Opteron X3000 left arrow Intel Xeon E5 v4
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Generation
    0 left arrow 6
  • Predecessor
    -- left arrow Intel Xeon E5-2695 v3
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Frequency
    2.10 GHz left arrow 2.20 GHz
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon R7 - 512 (Toronto) left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU frequency
    0.80 GHz left arrow
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    8 left arrow
  • Shader
    512 left arrow
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 and AMD Opteron X3421. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-2400 left arrow DDR4-2400
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 4
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD Opteron X3421 and Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    15 W left arrow 120 W
  • TDP up
    35 W left arrow --
  • TDP down
    12 W left arrow --
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD Opteron X3421 and Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
  • L2-Cache
    2.00 MB left arrow --
  • L3-Cache
    -- left arrow 45.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Toronto (Excavator) left arrow Broadwell E
  • Technology
    28 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V, AMD-Vt left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • Socket
    FP4 left arrow LGA 2011-3
  • Release date
    Q2/2015 left arrow Q1/2016
  • Part Number
    OX3421AAY43KA left arrow --

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD Opteron X3421 and Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Latest comparisons